Has UK Inflation Fallen More Than Expected With Clothing Prices Dropping?

Introduction: Trump’s Auto Tariffs and the UK Automotive Sector

The global automotive industry faced significant uncertainty following the announcement of new US tariffs under the Trump administration. Proposals included a potential 25% tariff on automotive imports into the US, alongside a baseline 10% tariff on most other goods imported from countries including the UK, and higher rates for others like the EU (20%). These announcements, sometimes followed by delays or pauses, created considerable market instability, impacting business planning cycles far beyond the direct financial implications of the tariffs themselves.

For the UK automotive sector, these proposed measures presented a serious challenge. The industry is heavily reliant on international trade, with the United States representing its second-largest single export market after the European Union. The timing of these potential tariffs added further pressure to a sector already navigating the complexities of post-pandemic recovery, persistent supply chain disruptions, and the capital-intensive transition towards electric vehicle (EV) production.

The stated aim of the US administration was that tariffs would protect domestic industries and encourage the reshoring of manufacturing jobs. However, this perspective was strongly contested by automotive industry associations and economists globally. Organisations like the UK’s Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT), the American Automotive Policy Council (AAPC), and the European Association of Automotive Suppliers (CLEPA) warned of negative consequences. They argued that tariffs function as taxes, ultimately increasing costs for businesses and consumers, disrupting established supply chains, reducing consumer choice, and potentially leading to job losses in exporting nations due to retaliatory measures or reduced demand.

This report analyses the potential impacts of the proposed US auto tariffs on UK car production, exports, employment, and supply chains, based on industry data and expert commentary available during the period of uncertainty. It also explores the consequent need for strategic business financing solutions to help UK automotive businesses navigate these challenges.

Impact on UK Car Production and Exports

The United States market holds substantial importance for the UK automotive industry. According to SMMT data from the period, the US consistently ranked as the UK’s second-largest car export destination, absorbing a significant portion of vehicles produced. In 2024, for instance, over 101,000 UK-built cars were shipped to the US, representing 16.9% of all car exports and generating £7.6 billion in trade value. These exports predominantly featured premium and luxury vehicles, a segment where British brands have historically performed well.

The prospect of a 25% tariff on these vehicles raised immediate concerns about the viability of exporting to the US market. The SMMT warned that manufacturers could not simply absorb such costs and might be forced to “review output in the face of constrained demand”. This threat came at a time when UK car production was already experiencing a protracted downturn, with figures showing consecutive months of declining output compared to previous years. Data indicated significant drops in overall production, with February 2025 seeing an 11.6% decline year-on-year, marking the 12th consecutive month of falling auto manufacturing output. Year-to-date figures for early 2025 showed similar double-digit declines compared to the previous year.

This pre-existing fragility, driven partly by global chip shortages, pandemic after-effects, and the costly structural shift towards EV manufacturing (which often requires temporary production halts for retooling), made the UK sector particularly vulnerable to the shock of new tariffs. An industry already facing headwinds and reduced capacity has less resilience to absorb additional costs or fund mitigation strategies.

Consequently, the potential impact on UK employment was severe. The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) estimated that over 25,000 direct manufacturing jobs could be at risk if tariffs led to reduced exports or offshoring of production. Specific manufacturers with significant US export exposure, such as Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) and BMW’s Mini plant in Cowley, were highlighted as particularly vulnerable. Indeed, reports emerged of JLR temporarily pausing shipments to the US immediately following the tariff announcements as they assessed the implications.

Supply Chain Disruptions and Cost Implications

Modern automotive manufacturing relies on highly complex and globally integrated supply chains. Components often cross international borders multiple times before a vehicle is fully assembled. This intricate network makes the industry acutely sensitive to tariffs, which can impact costs at various stages – from raw materials like steel and aluminum (which faced separate tariffs) to sophisticated sub-assemblies and finished vehicles.

The proposed US tariffs threatened to significantly increase costs for UK and European manufacturers. The SMMT and other industry bodies stated unequivocally that manufacturers could not absorb the full impact of a 25% levy on finished vehicles or the baseline 10% on components. This inability to absorb costs stems from the already tight margins in volume manufacturing and the substantial investments being made in electrification.

The most likely outcome, according to analysts and industry insiders, was that these additional costs would be passed on to US consumers in the form of higher vehicle prices. Estimates varied, but some economic analyses suggested potential price increases ranging from $4,000 to $10,000 per vehicle, depending on the model and origin. Such price hikes would inevitably dampen consumer demand, potentially leading to reduced sales volumes and limiting the choice of models available to US buyers, particularly affecting iconic British brands popular in the premium segment.

This situation created a difficult strategic dilemma for manufacturers. Absorbing the tariff costs would directly impact profitability, potentially hindering investment in future technologies like EVs or even threatening financial viability. Passing the costs on risked losing market share to competitors unaffected by the tariffs or to domestic US producers. Premium and luxury brands, often with stronger brand loyalty and less price-sensitive customers, might have found it easier to pass on costs compared to volume manufacturers competing more directly on price.

The pressure extended down the supply chain. Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers faced the possibility of being squeezed by OEMs attempting to mitigate their own cost increases. Smaller suppliers, often operating with thinner margins and less financial cushion, were identified as particularly vulnerable to disruptions in demand or pressure to lower prices. Furthermore, if manufacturers opted for localisation strategies (shifting production to the US), UK and European suppliers could lose significant business.

Industry Responses and Strategic Adjustments

Faced with the prospect of substantial tariffs, the automotive industry began evaluating a range of potential responses and strategic adjustments:

• Localisation of Production: A prominent consideration was shifting manufacturing operations to the US to bypass import tariffs. Several European manufacturers were reported to be accelerating plans to expand or establish US production facilities. While a logical long-term strategy for manufacturers heavily reliant on the US market, localisation involves significant capital investment, long lead times, and complex regulatory hurdles related to quality, certification, and conformity of production.
• Pricing Strategies: In the short term, some manufacturers might have absorbed a portion of the tariff costs to maintain market share, particularly for existing stock. However, the prevailing view was that costs would largely be passed on to consumers, especially for premium models where demand might be less elastic.
• Market Diversification: The uncertainty surrounding the US market could have prompted manufacturers to renew their focus on other export destinations, such as the EU (despite its own trade complexities) or growing markets in Asia. This could potentially increase competition within these regions.
• Supply Chain Re-evaluation: The tariffs underscored the need for businesses to have a deep understanding of their supply chains, identifying vulnerabilities and potential chokepoints. This could lead to efforts to source components more locally within the UK or Europe, or to diversify supplier bases to mitigate risks associated with specific trade routes.
• Focus on EV Transition: While tariffs presented a threat to traditional ICE vehicle exports, they could also be seen as an additional incentive to accelerate the transition to EVs. Investing in domestic EV production could align with government green growth agendas and tap into a growing global market segment, potentially supported by government incentives designed to counteract tariff impacts.

Alongside these potential strategic shifts, industry bodies like the SMMT consistently called for diplomatic solutions. They urged the UK, EU, and US governments to engage in negotiations to reduce or eliminate the proposed tariffs, emphasizing the mutually beneficial nature of the existing transatlantic automotive trade relationship. There were also calls for supportive domestic policies in the UK – including measures to ease the cost burden of the EV transition, reform business rates, and invest in skills – to strengthen the sector’s overall resilience against external shocks like tariffs.

The situation highlighted a complex strategic landscape. While US localisation offered a direct route to avoid tariffs, it required substantial investment and carried risks if US consumer demand faltered due to higher prices or shifting preferences. Conversely, refocusing on the UK/EU market might avoid US-specific issues but intensify competition closer to home. This uncertainty necessitated agile planning and robust financial backing.

Navigating Financial Challenges: Business Finance Options

The confluence of challenges facing the UK automotive sector – rising tariff costs, potential output reductions, the need for supply chain restructuring, significant investments required for localisation or accelerating EV production, and general market uncertainty – placed considerable financial strain on businesses throughout the supply chain. From large OEMs to smaller Tier 2 suppliers and dealerships, the need for financial resilience became paramount.

Accessing timely and appropriate finance is critical for navigating such turbulent periods. Funding may be required to manage short-term cash flow gaps caused by disrupted trade or increased costs, to invest in new machinery or production lines for EVs or localised manufacturing, or to support diversification into new markets. However, traditional bank lending, particularly for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs), can often be slow, require significant collateral, and may not be readily available, especially during periods of heightened economic uncertainty.

In this environment, specialist finance support is crucial. NexGen Business Finance offers expertise in navigating the funding landscape and provides access to a broad spectrum of lenders and financial products beyond what a single high-street bank might offer. With connections to over 95 lenders, NexGen can source solutions tailored to the specific, often urgent, needs created by challenges like unexpected tariffs.

The nature of the disruption caused by tariffs – sudden cost shocks, the need for rapid adaptation, and strategic pivots – makes alternative and flexible finance options particularly relevant. These solutions can often provide faster access to capital and are structured differently from traditional loans, offering adaptability that aligns well with the automotive sector’s current challenges.

Business Finance Options for UK Businesses from NexGen Business Finance

NexGen Business Finance is a dedicated finance broker committed to supporting UK businesses, including those impacted by trade fluctuations in the automotive sector. By leveraging our network of over 95 lenders, we provide access to a diverse range of funding solutions, ensuring businesses can find competitive rates and terms tailored to their specific circumstances. Our personalised support and commitment to transparency (including no broker fees) help businesses secure the financial tools they need to adapt and thrive.

Key finance options available through NexGen include:

• Business Loans: We source both unsecured and secured business loans. Unsecured loans, available up to £500,000, offer speed and flexibility without requiring specific assets as collateral, making them suitable for working capital, inventory financing, or investing in market diversification. Secured loans may provide access to larger sums or potentially lower interest rates, using business assets as security. Repayment terms are flexible, typically ranging from one month to seven years, allowing loans to be structured around strategic investment timelines.
• Merchant Cash Advance (MCA): An MCA provides a lump sum advance based on anticipated future credit and debit card sales. Repayment is made automatically as a pre-agreed percentage of daily card transactions. This flexible repayment structure is ideal for businesses with fluctuating revenues, such as dealerships or automotive retail outlets, providing working capital that adjusts with sales volume.
• Invoice Finance: This solution unlocks cash tied up in unpaid B2B invoices. Options include Invoice Factoring, where the lender also manages credit control, and Invoice Discounting, where the business retains control of its sales ledger. Businesses can typically access up to 90% of the invoice value, often within 24 hours. This is invaluable for suppliers in the automotive chain facing extended payment terms from larger customers or needing immediate funds to cover tariff-related cost increases or supply chain adjustments.
• Asset Finance: This enables businesses to acquire essential assets – such as manufacturing equipment, diagnostic tools, commercial vehicles, or IT systems – through leasing or hire purchase agreements. It spreads the cost of the asset over its useful life, preserving working capital for other operational needs. Asset finance is crucial for investing in new technologies, upgrading production lines (perhaps for EV components), or expanding logistics capabilities without large upfront capital expenditure.
• Bridging Loans: These are short-term loans designed to cover funding gaps until longer-term financing is secured or a specific transaction completes (e.g., purchasing new premises pending the sale of an old one). Speed of access is a key benefit. Bridging loans can be vital for covering immediate, time-sensitive costs arising from sudden strategic shifts prompted by tariffs, such as deposits on new equipment or initial setup costs for relocated operations.

By understanding these options and working with an experienced broker like NexGen Business Finance, UK automotive businesses can better equip themselves to handle the financial pressures imposed by trade tariffs and position themselves for resilience and future growth.

Facing challenges from trade tariffs or need funding for strategic adjustments? Explore tailored finance solutions today and connect with our network of over 95 lenders to find the perfect fit for your automotive business needs.